Arguments CR in NMAT 2024

Each question is followed by 2 arguments. find which of the following is True. NMAT 2024 choose the options:

---

A. Argument 1 is strong only

B. Argument 2 is strong only

C. Both 1 and 2 are strong

D. None of them is strong

E. 1 or 2 either of them is strong

---

1. Should working from home be made a permanent option for employees?
   Argument 1 (Yes): It improves work-life balance and reduces commuting stress.
   Argument 2 (No): It leads to poor team coordination and reduced collaboration.
2. Should plastic bags be completely banned across the country?
   Argument 1 (Yes): Plastic bags harm the environment and take centuries to decompose.
   Argument 2 (No): Banning them may hurt small vendors who rely on cheap packaging.
3. Should advertisements for junk food be banned during children’s TV shows?
   Argument 1 (Yes): It influences children’s food choices and promotes unhealthy habits.
   Argument 2 (No): Parents should be responsible for controlling what children eat.
4. Should students be allowed to grade their teachers?
   Argument 1 (Yes): It provides valuable feedback for improving teaching quality.
   Argument 2 (No): Students may give biased grades based on personal feelings.
5. Should exams be eliminated in favor of continuous assessment?
   Argument 1 (Yes): Continuous assessment reflects consistent performance and reduces pressure.
   Argument 2 (No): Exams are essential to test knowledge under time constraints.
6. Should mobile phones be banned in schools to improve student focus?
   Argument 1 (Yes): Mobile phones are a major source of distraction and hamper learning.
   Argument 2 (No): Banning phones may prevent students from accessing helpful educational apps.
7. Should voting be made compulsory in a democratic country?
   Argument 1 (Yes): It will increase political awareness and citizen participation.
   Argument 2 (No): Forcing people to vote goes against democratic freedom.
8. Should the government provide free internet access in public spaces?
   Argument 1 (Yes): It promotes digital inclusion and helps bridge the digital divide.
   Argument 2 (No): It will be misused for entertainment and strain public resources.
9. Should there be a law to cap the price of essential medicines?
   Argument 1 (Yes): It will ensure affordability for all sections of society.
   Argument 2 (No): It may reduce profits and discourage pharmaceutical innovation.
10. Should schools include coding as a mandatory subject from primary level?
    Argument 1 (Yes): Coding develops problem-solving skills and future readiness.
    Argument 2 (No): It adds pressure and may not interest all students.

---

Solutions: NMAT 2024

1. Both arguments are strong: Argument 1 highlights well-being and reduced stress, while Argument 2 presents a realistic challenge of collaboration that must be addressed.
2. Argument 1 is strong: Environmental damage from plastics is significant. Argument 2 is weak: vendor concerns are valid but solvable through alternative packaging subsidies.
3. Argument 1 is strong: Children are impressionable, and ads shape behavior. Argument 2 is weak: parental control cannot fully prevent ad exposure and influence.
4. Both arguments are strong: Feedback can help teachers, but student biases (favoritism, revenge grading) are also a valid concern.
5. Argument 1 is strong: Continuous assessment encourages learning over cramming. Argument 2 is also strong: exams test time-pressured recall, which has real-world relevance. Both approaches have merit.
6. Argument 1 is strong: Mobile phone misuse is a known issue in classrooms. Argument 2 is weak: while phones can support learning, misuse outweighs benefit in school contexts.
7. Argument 1 is weak: Awareness does not automatically increase with compulsory voting. Argument 2 is strong: forcing people to vote may violate personal liberty in a democracy.
8. Argument 1 is weak: Free internet access often gets misused or poorly maintained. Argument 2 is also weak: concern about misuse doesn’t justify denial of a modern need. So neither is strong.
9. Argument 1 is strong: Affordability for essential medicines is critical. Argument 2 is weak: price controls on essential drugs don’t prevent innovation entirely.
10. Argument 1 is strong: Coding builds skills needed for future tech roles. Argument 2 is also reasonable: not all students may enjoy coding, so flexibility is important. Both are partly valid depending on curriculum design.